top of page

Panama PNAF Update: 6 GHz, Direct-to-Cell and FWA Changes

19 hours ago
7 min read

Panama PNAF Update: ASEP Consults on Unlicensed Lower 6 GHz, Direct-to-Cell Rules, the FWA Canal Area and ITU RR-2024 Alignment


Panama's National Public Services Authority (Autoridad Nacional de los Servicios Públicos, ASEP) has opened Public Consultation No. 012-26 on proposed modifications to the National Frequency Allocation Plan (Plan Nacional de Atribución de Frecuencias, PNAF). This Panama PNAF update has four parts: opening the lower 6 GHz band to unlicensed use, regulating satellite Direct-to-Cell (D2C) services, redefining the Canal Area used for Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) assignments, and aligning the national allocation table with the 2024 edition of the ITU Radio Regulations.

Written comments are accepted from September 28, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. until October 28, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. The measures are proposals. Nothing changes for products on the Panamanian market until ASEP adopts a final resolution.


Why ASEP is revising the PNAF


The PNAF divides Panama's radio spectrum into segments and defines the services allowed in each. Under Law No. 31 of February 8, 1996, ASEP must keep the plan current with international treaties and with new technologies. In the consultation document, ASEP points to three developments behind this review: newer generations of Wi-Fi, low Earth orbit satellite systems, and direct satellite connectivity to ordinary mobile devices.

The 6 GHz question has been open for some time. In Public Consultation No. 011-24, ASEP proposed designating the full 5,925–7,125 MHz range for unlicensed use. Resolution AN No. 20335-Telco of May 5, 2025, left the band unchanged and deferred the matter to a later consultation. ASEP then held Public Forum No. 01-26 on July 7, 2026, and the current proposal is the result.


What the Panama PNAF update proposes


#

Topic

PNAF provision

Proposed change

1

ITU alignment

Article 14.8

Update the National Frequency Allocation Table to the ITU Radio Regulations (RR-2024), including decisions of WRC-23

2

Lower 6 GHz

New numeral 12.8

Designate 5.925–6.425 GHz (500 MHz) as a "free use or unlicensed" band for low-power devices

3

Fixed Wireless Access

Numeral 22.1.3

Redefine the "Canal Area" assignment zone to match the Canal Operation Compatibility Area in Law No. 21 of July 2, 1997

4

Direct-to-Cell

New numeral 8.5

Set conditions for D2C service in Mobile Satellite Service bands, including terminal homologation


1. Alignment with ITU RR-2024


ASEP proposes revising 29 segments of the allocation table, from HF broadcasting at 7,300 kHz up to 248 GHz. Many of the segments involve satellite allocations, including Mobile Satellite Service ranges in the L-band (around 1.5 and 1.6 GHz) and Fixed Satellite Service ranges in the Ku and Ka bands. The exact edits are marked in the consultation document and should be reviewed there by any company whose products or networks rely on a specific allocation.


2. Lower 6 GHz band for unlicensed use


This is the part with the most direct effect on equipment makers. ASEP states that Wi-Fi 6E devices cannot currently be homologated in Panama, because operation in this segment is not permitted. The proposal would change that for 5.925–6.425 GHz, using the technical parameters of CITEL Recommendation CCP.II/REC.70 (XLIV-24).

Two device classes are proposed:


Class

Where

Device type

Max EIRP

Max EIRP density

Out-of-band limit

LPI (low power indoor)

Indoor only

Access point or subordinate device

30 dBm

5 dBm/MHz

−27 dBm/MHz

LPI (low power indoor)

Indoor only

Client device

24 dBm

−1 dBm/MHz

−27 dBm/MHz

VLP (very low power)

Indoor and outdoor

User terminal

14 dBm

−5 dBm/MHz

−27 dBm/MHz


Operating restrictions in the draft text:


  • LPI access points and subordinate devices must use an integrated antenna and mains power. Battery-only operation and weatherproof enclosures are not allowed.

  • LPI devices may not be used in cars, trains or vessels, or for unmanned aircraft communications. Use aboard large aircraft flying above 10,000 feet is the stated exception.

  • VLP devices must use integrated antennas, may not be installed on buildings, poles, towers or other fixed outdoor structures, and must prioritize frequencies above 6.105 GHz before using 5.925–6.105 GHz.

  • All devices operate on a non-interference, non-protected basis.


Existing fixed and satellite assignments in the band are not affected. The upper segment, 6.425–7.125 GHz, is left for a second phase. ASEP says it wants more technical and regulatory input first, including the outcome of the World Radiocommunication Conference in 2027 (WRC-27). Standard-power operation and Automated Frequency Coordination are not part of this proposal.


3. FWA: a new definition of the Canal Area


FWA frequencies are assigned by geographic zone. Today the Canal Area is described only by reference to the Pacific locks (Cocolí and Miraflores) and the Atlantic locks (Gatún and Agua Clara). ASEP proposes defining it by the Canal Operation Compatibility Area in Law No. 21 of 1997, at the request of the Panama Canal Authority (ACP).

The 3,600–3,640 MHz reservation for the ACP stays in place. Assignments across 3,600–3,700 MHz would be allowed, by exception, along the maritime transit route between the locks. ASEP states that the change does not alter existing assignments, technical conditions or rights already granted.


4. Direct-to-Cell in Mobile Satellite Service bands


The proposed numeral 8.5 defines D2C as direct communication between satellites and conventional user terminals such as mobile phones and tablets. IoT terminals such as industrial sensors and trackers are excluded from the definition.

Main conditions for satellite concessionaires (Services No. 217 and No. 222):


  • The user terminal may access the satellite frequencies only where terrestrial mobile service (Services No. 106 and No. 107) is absent.

  • Spectrum is capped at 10 MHz Earth-to-space plus 10 MHz space-to-Earth (2 x 10 MHz).

  • An agreement with a mobile operator covering technical parameters, service quality and responsibilities is to be filed with ASEP for review.

  • The concessionaire must resolve harmful interference immediately, including by reducing power, reconfiguring beams or suspending emissions.

  • Terminals intended for D2C must comply with ASEP's Wireless Device Homologation Procedure for the Mobile Satellite Service bands, before commercial service begins.


The proposal follows two recent decisions. Resolution AN No. 22018-Telco of August 25, 2026, temporarily suspended the processing of new D2C applications in these bands. Resolution AN No. 22088-Telco of September 11, 2026, authorized Cable & Wireless Panama to offer commercial D2C in the AWS band over Starlink's network, under the existing numeral 8.4.


An infographic illustrating Panama's PNAF update, featuring a telecommunications tower, a satellite, a map of Panama highlighting the Canal Area, and a frequency spectrum graphic showing unlicensed Wi-Fi 6E/7 in the lower 6 GHz band.

What this means for manufacturers


Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7 products gain a route to market. If adopted, numeral 12.8 would let indoor access points, client devices and VLP portables operating in 5.925–6.425 GHz enter ASEP's homologation process for the first time.


Panama would be a lower-band-only market. Products certified elsewhere for the full 5.925–7.125 GHz range will need a country configuration that keeps operation within the lower 500 MHz and within Panama's EIRP and density limits.


Design rules matter as much as power limits. Integrated antennas, mains power and non-weatherproof housings are conditions for LPI access points. Outdoor access points and devices with external antennas fall outside the proposal.


D2C adds a homologation step for handsets and tablets. A device marketed for satellite service in MSS bands would need those bands covered in its Panamanian approval before the operator launches the service.


FWA equipment is largely unaffected. The change concerns where frequencies are assigned, not how customer premises equipment must perform.


Some details are still open. The consultation document does not say which test reports or standards ASEP will accept for 6 GHz, nor whether existing approvals can be extended to add the band. These are reasonable points to raise in written comments.


Certification impact summary


Product category

Position today

If the proposal is adopted

Certification impact

Indoor Wi-Fi 6E / Wi-Fi 7 access points, routers, mesh nodes

6 GHz operation cannot be homologated

Allowed as LPI, indoor only, 30 dBm EIRP, 5 dBm/MHz

High: new or updated ASEP homologation covering 5.925–6.425 GHz

Client devices (phones, laptops, tablets)

6 GHz operation cannot be homologated

Allowed as LPI clients, 24 dBm EIRP, −1 dBm/MHz

High: 6 GHz can be enabled once covered by homologation

Portable VLP devices

Not permitted

Allowed indoors and outdoors, 14 dBm EIRP, −5 dBm/MHz

Medium: new device class, integrated antenna required

Outdoor or standard-power 6 GHz equipment, external antennas

Not permitted

Still not permitted

None: remains outside the framework

Devices using 6.425–7.125 GHz

Not permitted

Still not permitted, second phase

None for now: restrict operation to the lower band

D2C-capable phones and tablets (MSS bands)

No dedicated PNAF rule

Homologation for MSS bands required before commercial launch

Medium to high: confirm band coverage in approvals

IoT satellite terminals

Outside the D2C definition

Still outside the D2C definition

No change from this proposal

FWA customer equipment, 3.6 GHz

Assigned by zone

Canal Area boundary redefined

Low: no change to technical conditions


Timeline and required actions


Date

Milestone

Status

May 5, 2025

Resolution AN No. 20335-Telco leaves 6 GHz unchanged pending further study

Completed

July 7, 2026

ASEP Public Forum No. 01-26 on the 6 GHz band

Completed

August 25, 2026

Resolution AN No. 22018-Telco suspends new D2C applications in MSS bands

In force

September 22, 2026

Notice ANAT-034-26 convenes Public Consultation No. 012-26

Published

September 28, 2026, 8:30 a.m.

Comment period opens

Open

October 28, 2026, 3:30 p.m.

Comment period closes

Deadline

After closing

ASEP publishes the closing record and comments, then issues its resolution

No date announced

2027

WRC-27, cited by ASEP as input for the upper 6 GHz decision

Pending


ASEP has not committed to a decision date. For reference, the previous PNAF consultation closed on October 31, 2024, and its resolution was issued on May 5, 2025, about six months later.


Required actions


  1. Now to October 28, 2026: Review the consultation document and decide whether to file comments, directly or through an industry association. Follow the submission instructions in Notice ANAT-034-26.

  2. Now: Map the product portfolio against the proposed LPI and VLP limits. Identify models that need a Panama-specific 6 GHz configuration.

  3. Now: Check design conditions for access points: integrated antenna, mains power, no weatherproof enclosure.

  4. Before the final resolution: Gather 6 GHz test reports and technical files so that homologation applications can be filed promptly after adoption.

  5. Until adoption: Keep 6 GHz operation disabled in products shipped to Panama. The band is not yet authorized.

  6. D2C handset makers and satellite operators: Confirm which MSS bands each device supports and plan the homologation step ahead of any commercial launch.

  7. After closing: Monitor ASEP for the closing record, the published comments and the final resolution, and for any follow-up consultation on 6.425–7.125 GHz.

bottom of page